AXIORY

AXIORY has operated since 2011, and its pitch to an automated trader is unusual on this catalogue: instead of leading with the lowest spread or the most regulators, it leads with proof. AXIORY publishes Quality-of-Execution statistics openly, and it supports cTrader alongside MT4 and MT5. This profile is written for one reader — someone about to point an Expert Advisor at a live AXIORY account — and it focuses on the decisions the data tables above don’t make for you: which account type fits your EA, what your real cost per trade will be, and where AXIORY’s transparency-first positioning genuinely helps versus where another broker would serve you better. We rank brokers on EA-relevant data, not on what they pay us; see how we choose in our best MT5 brokers for EA trading guide.

Why AXIORY’s published execution data matters for an EA

Every broker claims good execution. AXIORY is one of the few that publishes statistics you can read before you fund — its Quality-of-Execution reporting puts fill quality on the record rather than leaving it to marketing copy. For a manual trader that is a nice-to-have. For an EA it is closer to load-bearing, because an automated system lives or dies on the gap between the price it expects and the price it gets. A backtest assumes near-perfect fills; a live account does not. When a broker is willing to publish execution statistics openly, you can sanity-check that gap before you commit capital instead of reverse-engineering it from a month of bad statements.

The reason this is AXIORY’s defining strength is exposure time. A discretionary trader closes the platform and walks away flat. An EA holds positions, and your full balance, around the clock — so execution model quality is continuously relevant, not just at the moment of entry. AXIORY pairs that published transparency with a no-requote policy enforced at the order-routing layer and negative balance protection on retail accounts, so a catastrophic gap cannot push you below zero. Treat the published execution data as the thing that distinguishes AXIORY here: it is the broker for a trader who wants to verify fill quality rather than trust a logo wall, and you should confirm protection is active on your specific account type before you deploy anything leveraged.

Match the account type to your EA

AXIORY’s account range decides your cost structure, and cost structure is the difference between profit and loss for anything that trades often. Choosing the wrong account is the most common way a new user underperforms an EA’s published numbers. Use this picker, then read the account notes below it:

Nano — raw spreads for scalpers and high-frequency systems

The Nano account ($3.5/lot commission, raw spreads) is the cost-efficient default for any high-frequency strategy — scalping, grids, and anything trading more than roughly 50 positions a month. The logic is total cost: a tight raw spread plus a transparent fixed commission is cheaper and far more predictable than a wider all-in spread once trade frequency climbs. Nano also carries the highest leverage tier (1:1000) and the same $10 entry barrier as the rest of the range, which makes it the single best place on AXIORY to run a catalogued EA on real market data with minimal capital at risk. If your EA’s edge is measured in fractions of a pip, Nano is not optional.

Standard — commission-free for swing and trend systems

The Standard account charges no commission and carries a typical 1.1-pip spread on EUR/USD. For low-frequency trend and swing EAs that trade a few times a week and target large moves, the spread is a rounding error against the move size, and the zero-commission simplicity is genuinely easier to reason about. Standard runs at 1:777 leverage. Do not use it for a scalper — the 1.1-pip all-in spread is mid-pack and will quietly erode a fast system’s edge over hundreds of trades.

Tera — the cTrader account for cAlgo / cBot EAs

The Tera account ($3/lot commission, cTrader, 1:500 leverage) is AXIORY’s genuine differentiator. cTrader runs a different automation engine from MetaTrader: EAs for it are written as cBots in cAlgo, not as MetaTrader .ex4/.ex5 files, and they cannot run on MT4 or MT5. If your strategy is a cBot, Tera is the only path on this catalogue’s IB programme that runs it natively, and its $3 commission is competitive for ECN-preferred users. Note the scope, though: most mt5depot catalogue EAs are MetaTrader systems, so for those the MT5/MT4 path on Nano or Standard is primary — Tera matters specifically if you bring a cTrader-native bot of your own.

Spreads and total cost: Standard vs Nano

This is the calculation most traders skip, and it decides which AXIORY account is cheaper for your EA. Total cost per round-turn is spread (in account currency) + commission — never spread alone.

• Standard: ~1.1 pips spread, $0 commission. On a standard lot that is roughly $11 per round-turn, all in.
• Nano: raw spread (call it ~0.2 pips, ≈ $2) plus $3.5/lot commission ≈ ~$5 per round-turn.

For a swing EA taking 10 trades a month, the difference (~$60/month) is immaterial against the size of the moves it targets — Standard’s commission-free simplicity wins. For a scalper taking 200 trades a month, the same per-trade gap compounds to roughly $1,200/month, which can be the entire edge. Run the maths on your EA’s documented trade frequency before you choose, and remember the published backtest figures in the EA catalogue are measured on Exness retail-spread tick data — each EA profile documents how its spread compatibility holds up across the participating brokers, so treat those numbers as a costed hypothesis your own small-account week confirms.

The cTrader option: why it matters, and where it doesn’t

cTrader is worth understanding because it is the one thing AXIORY offers that no other broker here does. It is a separate platform with its own automation language: bots are built in cAlgo and run as cBots, a C#-based ecosystem distinct from MetaTrader’s MQL. A trader who has invested in a cBot — or who prefers cTrader’s depth-of-market interface and ECN-style order handling — gets a native home at AXIORY via the Tera account without compromising on a translated or bridged platform.

The honest boundary: mt5depot is an MT5 EA catalogue, and the overwhelming majority of the EAs here ship as .ex5 (MT5) or .ex4 (MT4) MetaTrader files. Those do not run on cTrader. So for the typical mt5depot user, the cTrader option is a bonus rather than the main event — the MT5/MT4 path on the Nano or Standard account is the primary route for catalogue EAs, and cTrader earns its place only if you are bringing your own cBot. AXIORY also supports MT4, which quietly preserves legacy .ex4 systems that cannot run on MT5 — a smaller but real advantage over MT5-only brokers.

What STP execution means when your EA fires an order

AXIORY runs an STP (straight-through processing) model: your orders are passed to liquidity providers rather than filled against an in-house dealing desk. For an EA, the property that matters is that market orders fill at the available price without the requote loop a pure market-maker can apply at candle close — and AXIORY’s no-requote policy is enforced at the routing layer, which is exactly the behaviour an automated system needs. The trade-off versus a pure latency-optimised ECN venue like TitanFX is a notch of routing latency, which matters for sub-second scalpers but is invisible to the vast majority of EAs trading on M5 and higher timeframes. For most of mt5depot’s catalogue, AXIORY’s STP execution is more than adequate; only a latency-critical high-frequency strategy should prefer a pure-ECN venue.

Platforms: MT5, MT4, and cTrader

AXIORY supports MT5, MT4, and cTrader — the widest platform spread on this catalogue. MT5 gives you the modern terminal with its better strategy tester and native economic calendar, MT4 preserves legacy .ex4 EAs, and cTrader opens the cBot path described above. Whichever platform you choose, the same rule applies: a mobile terminal monitors positions but cannot run an EA. Automation needs the desktop terminal running continuously, which means a VPS. A home machine that sleeps, updates, or drops its connection will miss trades and leave positions unmanaged — see our VPS for MT5 EAs guide for the setup.

Funding and withdrawals on an active EA account

AXIORY processes withdrawals in same day to 1 business day across bank wire, cards, e-wallets (Skrill, Neteller), crypto (BTC/USDT), and PerfectMoney, with a multi-currency account base including JPY. Same-day-to-one-day is reliable and entirely workable for an EA account, and it is quicker than the flat one-day processing at some catalogue brokers, though not the instant rails Exness offers on most methods. The difference only matters if you actively cycle profits out of a high-frequency account week to week; for most EA traders compounding inside the account, it is a non-issue.

Is AXIORY the right broker for your EA?

AXIORY is the transparency choice, and the case is specific: published Quality-of-Execution data lets you verify fill quality before you fund, the no-requote routing suits automated order flow, the Nano account gives scalpers a cost-efficient raw-spread home at a $10 barrier, and the Tera/cTrader option is the only native path here for cBot strategies. For a trader who values being able to check a broker’s execution rather than take it on faith — and for anyone running cTrader bots — AXIORY is a strong fit.

Where it is not the first pick: a trader chasing the absolute lowest spread will find Exness cheaper (0.7 vs 1.1 pips on the commission-free account), and a trader who weighs regulatory breadth above all else will prefer HFM, which carries a UK FCA licence and six regulators against AXIORY’s IFSC Belize plus FSC Mauritius pairing. AXIORY’s own caveats are honest: a shorter track record and smaller AUM than XM, HFM, or Exness mean counterparty exposure deserves a thought, and the Standard spread is mid-pack. For a transparency-focused or cTrader-using EA trader, none of that outweighs the strengths.

How AXIORY compares to the rest of the catalogue

Briefly, against the other catalogued brokers: AXIORY trails Exness on raw spread and instant withdrawals but is the only broker here that publishes execution statistics and supports cTrader; it concedes regulatory breadth and track record to HFM while matching it on STP execution and beating it on platform range; it gives up pure-ECN latency to TitanFX but offers a transparency layer TitanFX does not; and it shares an offshore, newer-broker profile with FXGT while differentiating on its published QoE reporting and cTrader support. The full side-by-side is in our best MT5 brokers for EA trading comparison, and the criteria behind these judgements are set out in how to choose a broker for EAs.

Opening an AXIORY account for EA trading, step by step

1. Open the account through the link on this page. Using our IB link costs you nothing extra and is how mt5depot funds this catalogue (see the transparency note below).
2. Choose your account type by strategy — Nano for scalp/grid raw spreads, Standard for commission-free swing/trend, Tera if you run cTrader cBots. You can open more than one.
3. Download the platform your EA needs — MT5 or MT4 for MetaTrader EAs, cTrader for cBots. The mobile apps cannot run EAs.
4. Fund the documented minimum for your EA ($10 entry), not your full bankroll, and run a one-week demo or small-account trial first.
5. Set up a VPS before going live so the EA runs 24/7 next to the broker’s servers rather than on a home machine that can sleep or disconnect.

How to actually use AXIORY’s Quality-of-Execution report

AXIORY’s defining feature for an automated trader is that it publishes a quarterly Quality-of-Execution report — public statistics on slippage, fill rate, and execution latency. Most offshore brokers ask you to take execution quality on faith; AXIORY hands you numbers. But a published report is only worth what you do with it, and most traders glance at it and move on. Here is how to make it count for an EA.

Read it before you commit capital, not after a bad week. The report is a screening tool. If the headline fill rate and average slippage are in line with what your EA’s backtest assumed, that is one fewer unknown when live results diverge from the historical curve. If the numbers are visibly worse than your EA’s modelled assumptions, you have learned something a marketing page would never tell you — before funding rather than after.

Map slippage to your EA’s edge size. Slippage matters in proportion to how thin your edge is. A scalping EA whose average win is a handful of pips is acutely sensitive to a half-pip of slippage on entry and exit; a trend system targeting large moves can absorb it. Read AXIORY’s published slippage figure through that lens, then confirm it on your own account — a published average is a fleet number, and your VPS location, account type, and trading hours all move your personal result around it.

Treat the report as a hypothesis your demo week confirms. Published statistics describe AXIORY’s order flow in aggregate; they do not describe your specific EA on your specific symbols. The honest workflow is: read the report to decide whether AXIORY is worth a trial, then run your EA on a demo or small Nano account for a week and compare your own observed fills against the published averages. When they line up, you have rare confidence that live behaviour will track the backtest; when they don’t, you have caught a mismatch cheaply. That loop — public claim, then personal verification — is exactly the discipline mt5depot’s own methodology applies to every figure it publishes, and AXIORY is one of the few brokers that gives you the raw material to run it.

How mt5depot earns money

A money page should say plainly how it is funded, so: when you open an AXIORY account through the IB link on this page, mt5depot earns an introducing-broker (IB) commission from AXIORY on your trading activity. It costs you nothing extra — your spread and commission are identical to opening directly, and there is no markup added on our side.

AXIORY is deliberately kept neutral in our comparisons: it is not a broker we steer volume toward, and it earns its place on this catalogue on its execution transparency and cTrader support rather than on what it pays us. That neutrality is the point — listing a broker we are not commercially leaning on is how a money page keeps its analysis honest. Exact IB commission terms are commercial and may change, so we describe the relationship rather than quote a rate; confirm any figure that matters to you with AXIORY directly. Our incentive is to send you to a broker you stay with because it suits your EA, since an account you abandon in a month is worth nothing to either of us.

Who can open an AXIORY account — country and region restrictions

AXIORY accepts offshore clients across most regions, but by regulation it does not accept clients in the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan, Iran, or the DPRK. EU and UK retail traders are declined rather than routed to a local entity, and the offshore IFSC Belize entity documented here is intended for non-EU/UK English-speaking traders. Confirm your country is serviced before you fund, because an EA can only ever compound the capital you were actually able to deposit.

The entity you onboard under (IFSC Belize, with FSC Mauritius secondary) is a single-primary-regulator footprint — narrower than the multi-jurisdiction brokers on this catalogue — but it still provides segregated client money and negative balance protection on retail accounts. That narrower regulatory base is the honest counterweight to AXIORY’s execution transparency, and it is worth weighing against your own risk tolerance before transferring funds.

Risks and what to confirm before you fund

Leverage up to 1:1000 on the Nano account is a tool, not a target — size your risk as if it were capped, because an EA that over-positions on high leverage fails by drawdown, not by being wrong about direction. Before deploying, confirm three things on your specific account: that negative balance protection is active, that your country is serviced (the restricted regions are listed under who can open an account above), and that your EA’s platform and permitted strategies match how it trades. Weigh the shorter track record and single-primary-regulator footprint honestly against the transparency you gain. The detailed testing process behind every figure we publish is on our methodology page.

FAQ

Is AXIORY good for EA / automated trading? Yes. AXIORY allows EAs across MT5, MT4, and cTrader, enforces a no-requote policy at the routing layer, and publishes Quality-of-Execution statistics so you can verify fill quality before funding. STP execution is well-suited to EAs on M5 and higher timeframes.

Which AXIORY account is best for an EA? Nano ($3.5/lot, raw spreads) for scalping and grids, Standard (commission-free, ~1.1 pips) for low-frequency swing and trend systems, and Tera ($3/lot, cTrader) if your EA is a cBot. Match the account to your EA’s platform and trade frequency.

Can I run a cTrader / cBot EA on AXIORY? Yes — AXIORY is the only broker on this catalogue with native cTrader support via the Tera account, so cBots written in cAlgo run without a bridge. Note that most mt5depot catalogue EAs are MetaTrader .ex4/.ex5 files, which run on MT4/MT5 rather than cTrader.

Is AXIORY regulated and safe? AXIORY is regulated by IFSC Belize (000048/210) and FSC Mauritius (GB23201139), with negative balance protection on retail accounts and a no-requote execution policy. Its regulatory breadth is narrower than HFM or Exness, which is the main trade-off against its execution transparency.

Does AXIORY publish its execution quality? Yes — AXIORY publishes Quality-of-Execution reporting openly, which is uncommon among offshore brokers and the broker’s defining strength for an EA trader who wants to verify fill quality rather than infer it from their own statements.

Next steps

If AXIORY fits your EA, open the account by strategy — Nano for raw-spread scalping, Standard for commission-free swing, Tera for cBots — and start with a demo or small-account week before funding live. From there, browse the EA catalogue for a system matched to your risk tolerance, set up a VPS, and compare AXIORY against the full field in the best MT5 brokers for EA trading guide. The traders who last are the ones who verified on a small account first.