What is the difference between A/D and OBV?

Both are running totals of the same tick volume; they differ in how a bar's volume is credited. OBV assigns the whole of it to one side based on whether the bar closed above or below the previous close. A/D splits it by where the close sat inside that bar's own high-low range, so a bar can contribute a fraction, and a bar that closes exactly mid-range contributes nothing at all. The practical difference shows up on reversal bars: a long red candle that closed well off its low subtracts everything from OBV and adds a little to A/D.

What is the difference between A/D and the Chaikin Oscillator?

The Chaikin Oscillator is this line differenced — a three-period average of A/D minus a ten-period one. That throws away the arbitrary level and leaves a series with a meaningful zero. If you want to know which way accumulation has gone over a stretch, read A/D. If you want an event you can act on, the oscillator crossing zero is one and A/D has none.

What settings should I use?

There are none. iAD takes a symbol, a timeframe and a volume type — no period, no applied price, no method. The only choices are which timeframe to accumulate on and what lookback you compare against, and the lookback lives in your rule rather than in the indicator.

Why does my A/D value differ from another platform's?

Almost certainly because of where the count started. The total accumulates from the oldest bar loaded, so a terminal with two years of history and one with ten will show different numbers for the same bar. Tick volume also varies between brokers. Neither affects the shape or any difference between two bars, which is all the indicator is usable for.

Can I build an A/D EA without coding?

Yes. The A/D Divergence Dip Buy template reads the line at the bar that just closed and at the eleventh bar back, reads the close at the same two bars, and requires the total to be higher while price is lower. The mirrored pair sells. There are no indicator parameters to set — only the lookback shifts and the stop distances.

How should I validate settings before going live?

Backtest on quality tick data, then run on a demo account before risking money. Two cautions specific to this one. Tick volume is broker-specific, so results carried over from someone else's data deserve extra scepticism. And the ten-bar lookback is a stand-in for swing-to-swing divergence, not the same thing — it fires far more often, so read the trade count before the profit and check whether a different lookback changes the answer entirely.

Accumulation/Distribution for MT5 traders

What the A/D line tells you

Each bar gets a score between −1 and +1 for where it closed between its own high and low. Multiply that score by the bar's volume and add it to a running total. A day that closes on its high with heavy trading adds a lot; the same volume closing mid-range adds nothing at all. The result is a line that goes up while closes are being pushed toward highs and down while they are being pushed toward lows. Because it is a total, the number itself depends on where the chart's history begins and means nothing — the two things you can read are which way it is sloping and whether that agrees with price.

Rising: closes are landing near highs, and volume is behind them
Falling: closes are landing near lows
Flat while price moves: the range is being covered but the closes are not committing

1 Score the bar: ((close − low) − (high − close)) / (high − low)
2 Multiply the score by the bar's volume
3 Add it to the running total

عرض الصيغة وتفاصيل الحساب

The Accumulation/Distribution line is one score and one running total:

MFM = ((close − low) − (high − close)) / (high − low)
A/D = A/D[1] + MFM × volume

The first line places the close between the bar’s own extremes: at the high it is +1, at the low −1, exactly in the middle 0. The second weights that by how much trading the bar took and adds it to everything before it. So the line rises while closes are being pushed toward highs on real participation and falls while they are being pushed toward lows.

In MQL5 the call is iAD(symbol, period, applied_volume) — three arguments, and there is no period among them. There is nothing to optimise inside the indicator, because there is no window: every bar in the loaded history contributes. There is one buffer, read at index 0, drawn with DRAW_LINE, and the reference says so plainly.

Two consequences shape every rule you can build.

The level is meaningless. The total starts wherever the chart’s history starts, so the absolute number belongs to your terminal’s download rather than to the market. It changes when more history arrives. What survives that is the shape and every difference between two bars, which is why the Builder’s template never references a value — only one shift against another.

There is no zero to cross. Most oscillators hand you an event: a crossing, a threshold, a sign change. A/D hands you a slope. The nearest thing to an event is disagreement with price, and the classic version of it — a price swing low against an A/D swing low — needs swing detection the node palette does not have. The template uses a fixed ten-bar lookback instead, which is the same idea coarsened enough to be buildable, and it is worth being clear that the two are not the same test.

Where A/D earns its place next to OBV is on bars that reversed inside themselves. A long red candle that fell hard and closed back near its high subtracts its entire volume from OBV and adds to A/D. Neither answer is wrong; they are answers to different questions, and A/D’s question — where did the closes land inside their own ranges — is the one the Chaikin Oscillator then differences into something with a zero.

الإشارات

الإشارات المتميزة والقابلة للاختبار التي يوفرها A/D — والنظام الملائم لكل منها.

Divergence from Price

جاهز في المنشئ

الشرط: Price is lower than it was N bars ago while A/D is higher
أفضل نظام: Trend exhaustion
الاستخدام النموذجي: The template's rule — buying went on through the decline

Slope Agreement

جاهز في المنشئ

الشرط: A/D is above its own value N bars ago
أفضل نظام: Trending
الاستخدام النموذجي: A permission filter for entries decided by price

Breakout Confirmation

جاهز في المنشئ

الشرط: Price leaves a range and A/D is rising with it
أفضل نظام: Breakout
الاستخدام النموذجي: Separate a break that was accumulated into from one that drifted

Swing-to-Swing Divergence

منطق متقدم

الشرط: Price makes a new low and the A/D total's swing low is higher
أفضل نظام: Trend exhaustion
الاستخدام النموذجي: The classic reading; needs swing detection rather than a fixed lookback

تنفيذ MT5

ما يحسبه ويرسمه ميتاتريدر 5 فعليًا — وهو المرجع الذي كُتبت وفقه كل قاعدة في هذه الصفحة.

المخازن

الفهرس	المخزن	طريقة الرسم في MT5	ما يحتويه
0	MAIN_LINE	Line	The running total. One buffer, drawn with DRAW_LINE. The reference says so without qualification — 'It has only one buffer' — and the example on the same page copies index 0 and nothing else.

ملاحظات المنصة

دالة MQL5

iAD

السعر المطبَّق

لا يأخذ هذا المؤشر وسيط السعر المطبَّق.

في المنشئ

iAD takes a symbol, a timeframe and an ENUM_APPLIED_VOLUME — three arguments, and there is no period among them. The Builder's node fixes the volume to tick and exposes shift, timeframe and a variable name; there is nothing else to expose, because the calculation has no window.

ملاحظات التنفيذ

There is no zero to cross, so a Constant node of 0 is useless here. Every A/D rule is two reads of the same indicator at different shifts, which is why the template places two A/D nodes and compares them against each other.
Both A/D nodes have identical arguments and resolve to the same MT5 handle, so the total is computed once. The nodes differ only in the CopyBuffer start offset — 1 and 11 in the generated code.
The rule reads shift 1 against shift 11 rather than shift 0 against shift 10. The forming bar's volume is still being counted and its high and low are still moving, so its contribution to the total is partial; comparing a partial bar's total with a completed one biases the comparison by however far into the bar you are.
A fixed lookback is not the classic divergence. The published reading compares swing lows in price with swing lows in the total, which needs swing detection on two series at once and is not expressible as nodes. Ten bars back is a stand-in that fires more often and with less meaning per firing — worth knowing before reading a backtest of it.
The magnitude carries the instrument's volume units, so no threshold on the value transfers anywhere. The template never uses one.

يعمل بشكل أفضل / استخدم بحذر

لا يوجد مؤشر ذو ميزة شاملة. إليك أين يساعد A/D — وأين يضلل.

يعمل بشكل أفضل

Confirming that a breakout was accumulated into rather than drifted through
Higher timeframes, where the close's position in the bar carries information
As a second opinion on a move price alone has already suggested
Instruments and sessions where the tick count actually reflects activity

استخدم بحذر

The level itself — it depends entirely on how much history your terminal has loaded
Bars that gap; the score only measures the distance travelled inside the bar
Comparing the value across symbols, timeframes or even brokers
Doji-heavy quiet stretches, where a close in the middle of a tiny range adds nothing at any volume

بناء استراتيجية A/D

اربط الإشارة بقواعد الدخول والخروج، ثم صدّر EA MT5 قابلاً للترجمة — بدون كود.

A/D at the bar that just closed (shift 1) and at the eleventh bar back
Close at the same two bars
A/D higher AND price lower → Open Buy · SL 50 / TP 150
A/D lower AND price higher → Open Sell

دمج A/D مع مؤشرات أخرى

نادراً ما يقف مؤشر واحد وحده. هذه التوليفات تغطي النقاط العمياء لـ A/D.

A/D + Chaikin Oscillator

A/D above its value 10 bars ago
Chaikin above zero
Buy

السبب: The Chaikin Oscillator is this line with the level thrown away — a fast average of A/D minus a slow one. Reading them together is reading the same series at two speeds: A/D says which way the accumulation has gone over the whole stretch, and the oscillator says whether the recent part of it has turned. It is not an independent confirmation, and knowing that is the point
أفضل نظام: Trending

No single-flow template pairs them. Start from A/D Divergence Dip Buy and add a Chaikin node with a Compare against a Constant of 0 into the existing AND gate.

افتح المنشئ →

A/D + OBV

A/D above its value 10 bars ago
OBV above its value 10 bars ago
Buy

السبب: The other running total, built from the same tick volume by a different rule. OBV gives a bar's whole volume to whichever way it closed against the previous close; A/D splits that volume by where the close sat inside the bar. They part company exactly on the bars that reversed intrabar — a long red candle that closed off its low adds to A/D and subtracts from OBV
أفضل نظام: Trending

No single-flow template pairs the two. Start from A/D Divergence Dip Buy and add an OBV node plus a second OBV node at shift 11, compared against each other the same way the A/D pair is.

افتح المنشئ →

A/D + Bollinger Bands

Price below the lower band
A/D above its value 10 bars ago
Buy

السبب: A divergence says the flow disagrees with price but not when to act on it. A band gives the disagreement a place to resolve: price stretched to the lower band while the total is still rising is the same reading with an entry level attached
أفضل نظام: Reversal

No single-flow template pairs them. Start from A/D Divergence Dip Buy and swap the Close-versus-Close pair for a Bollinger node and a Price node into a Compare.

افتح المنشئ →

المعاملات

قيم أولية للتحقق على زوجك الخاص وإطارك الزمني — ليست إعدادات مضمونة.

المعامل	الافتراضي	نطاق الاختبار المقترح	ما يفعله
Shift	0	0–30	Which bar back the node reads the total from. It is the only setting that changes what the node returns, and the template is built entirely out of it: since A/D has no level and no zero, every rule is one shift compared against another.
Timeframe	Current	M1–MN1	Which chart the total is accumulated on. Changing it changes the series completely — an H1 A/D and an H4 A/D are different totals over the same market, not the same total sampled differently.
Applied volume	Tick volume	Tick or Real	Which volume series is accumulated. The Builder fixes this to tick volume, because real volume is unavailable on most retail forex feeds. It is the third and last argument iAD takes.
Period	Not applicable	—	There is none. The total has no averaging window; every bar since the start of the loaded history contributes. This is why the level is arbitrary and only differences are usable.

الإعدادات المسبقة الأولية

There are none — iAD takes a symbol, a timeframe and a volume type. Nothing else exists to preset.

أمثلة السوق

أين يعمل A/D، وأين يفشل، وكيف يغير الفلتر النتيجة.

يعمل

Accumulation through a decline

Price grinds ten bars lower while each bar closes in the upper half of its range. The total finishes higher than it started, the entry fires, and the fixed target is reached on the rebound.

يفشل

Divergence with nothing behind it

A quiet stretch where price slips a few pips and one heavy bar closing near its high lifts the total. Both conditions are met and the disagreement is a rounding error.

مُصفّى

The decline the rule declines

Price falls ten bars and the closes land near the lows all the way down. The total falls with it, the divergence condition is not met, and no entry is taken — which is the difference between selling pressure and accumulation into weakness.

المؤشرات ذات الصلة

Chaikin Oscillator عرض الدليل →

OBV عرض الدليل →

MFI عرض الدليل →

FAQ

What is the difference between A/D and OBV?: Both are running totals of the same tick volume; they differ in how a bar's volume is credited. OBV assigns the whole of it to one side based on whether the bar closed above or below the previous close. A/D splits it by where the close sat inside that bar's own high-low range, so a bar can contribute a fraction, and a bar that closes exactly mid-range contributes nothing at all. The practical difference shows up on reversal bars: a long red candle that closed well off its low subtracts everything from OBV and adds a little to A/D.
What is the difference between A/D and the Chaikin Oscillator?: The Chaikin Oscillator is this line differenced — a three-period average of A/D minus a ten-period one. That throws away the arbitrary level and leaves a series with a meaningful zero. If you want to know which way accumulation has gone over a stretch, read A/D. If you want an event you can act on, the oscillator crossing zero is one and A/D has none.
What settings should I use?: There are none. iAD takes a symbol, a timeframe and a volume type — no period, no applied price, no method. The only choices are which timeframe to accumulate on and what lookback you compare against, and the lookback lives in your rule rather than in the indicator.
Why does my A/D value differ from another platform's?: Almost certainly because of where the count started. The total accumulates from the oldest bar loaded, so a terminal with two years of history and one with ten will show different numbers for the same bar. Tick volume also varies between brokers. Neither affects the shape or any difference between two bars, which is all the indicator is usable for.
Can I build an A/D EA without coding?: Yes. The A/D Divergence Dip Buy template reads the line at the bar that just closed and at the eleventh bar back, reads the close at the same two bars, and requires the total to be higher while price is lower. The mirrored pair sells. There are no indicator parameters to set — only the lookback shifts and the stop distances.
How should I validate settings before going live?: Backtest on quality tick data, then run on a demo account before risking money. Two cautions specific to this one. Tick volume is broker-specific, so results carried over from someone else's data deserve extra scepticism. And the ten-bar lookback is a stand-in for swing-to-swing divergence, not the same thing — it fires far more often, so read the trade count before the profit and check whether a different lookback changes the answer entirely.

Glossary

المصطلحات الرئيسية

الاختبار الخلفي (باك تست)الإفراط في التحسين السبريد